The ‘Rules-Based International Order’ in the West is a False Pretense: Exposing the Reality : Analysis

The concept of a “rules-based international order” often touted by the US and its allies is a selective and asymmetrical system designed to maintain Washington’s dominance. It lacks clear legal definitions and is used to reinterpret global norms to suit their interests while demanding strict compliance from others. This system allows Western powers to assert their will through international bodies like the UN, WTO, and IMF while minimizing accountability for their own violations. The US occupation of parts of Syria without UN mandate or permission from the Syrian government, compared to the reaction to Russia’s reabsorption of Crimea, highlights the double standards at play. The military might of the US underpins this order, enabling Washington to act with near impunity while ignoring opposing legal opinions. Russian criticism of this system, echoed by other countries like China and Iran, reflects a growing rejection of Western-imposed norms and a pushback against perceived injustices in the international order.

Analysis:
The article presents a critical perspective on the concept of a “rules-based international order,” alleging that it is selectively applied by Western powers, particularly the US, to maintain their dominance. The article argues that this system lacks clear legal definitions and is utilized to serve the interests of Western countries while demanding strict adherence from others. The piece suggests that the US and its allies leverage international bodies like the UN, WTO, and IMF to assert their will while sidestepping accountability for their own transgressions.

While the article raises valid points about the potential biases and double standards in how international norms are interpreted and enforced, it is crucial to consider the credibility of the sources cited and the overall tone of the piece. The article seems to be written from a particular ideological standpoint that critiques US hegemony and questions the legitimacy of the current global order.

In the context of the current political landscape and the prevalence of fake news, this article could contribute to shaping public perceptions by highlighting the complexities and power dynamics at play in the international arena. It underscores the importance of critical thinking and a nuanced understanding of how geopolitical forces influence the construction and maintenance of global norms and institutions. Awareness of potential biases in the information presented is essential to discerning the complexities of international relations and avoiding misinformation.

Source: RT news: The West’s ‘rules-based international order’ is a sham: Here’s why