Will Morocco continue with its normalization of relations with Israel? : Analysis

Despite public anger over Israel’s war on Gaza, analysts believe that the normalization deal between Morocco and Israel will remain intact. Recent protests in Morocco have seen thousands marching against Israel’s actions in Gaza and criticizing their government’s dealings with Israel. The Moroccan government has called for a ceasefire and supports a two-state solution, but has not commented on its foreign policy towards Israel. The normalization agreement was signed as part of the Abraham Accords, with Morocco seeking recognition of its claim to Western Sahara in return. While public sentiment towards Israel in Morocco has never been warm, the relationship between the two countries is facing strain due to the conflict in Gaza. Economic ties, such as direct flights and tourism, have been impacted, but security and defense cooperation have grown. Morocco’s military advantage and the benefits it has gained from its partnership with Israel make it unlikely for Morocco to walk away from the deal. Despite criticism from the Moroccan people, the government intends to maintain its course. The war in Gaza may slow down the normalization process between Israel and other Arab states, but it is unlikely to completely halt it. Relations with the UAE remain unaffected, and negotiations with Saudi Arabia have only slowed. The long-term impact of the conflict on perceptions of the US and its regional alliances remains to be seen. Ultimately, the future of the normalization deal depends on Israel’s actions.

Analysis:
The article presents an analysis of the current situation between Morocco and Israel in the context of the conflict in Gaza. While the article provides information about recent protests in Morocco against Israel’s actions and criticism of the government’s dealings with Israel, it does not provide any credible sources to support these claims. The mention of Morocco’s government calling for a ceasefire and supporting a two-state solution is also lacking in verifiable sources.

The article mentions that the normalization agreement between Morocco and Israel was signed as part of the Abraham Accords, with Morocco seeking recognition of its claim to Western Sahara in return. However, no source is provided to validate this claim.

The article highlights the strain on the relationship between Morocco and Israel due to the conflict in Gaza, but it does not provide specific examples or evidence of how economic ties, such as direct flights and tourism, have been impacted. The mention of security and defense cooperation growing between the two countries lacks supporting evidence.

The article concludes that despite criticism from the Moroccan people, the government intends to maintain its course and that the war in Gaza may slow down the normalization process between Israel and other Arab states, but is unlikely to completely halt it. However, no sources are provided to support these conclusions.

Overall, the article lacks credible sources and verifiable evidence to support its claims and analysis. It presents opinions and speculation without backing them up with factual information. This lack of credibility and evidence contributes to the potential for misinformation or a limited understanding of the topic.

In the current political landscape with the prevalence of fake news, the lack of credible sources and evidence in this article can contribute to the public’s perception of the information. Without reliable sources and verifiable information, readers may be more likely to question or dismiss the claims made in the article. This can further fuel skepticism and a lack of trust in media sources, especially when it comes to political topics and international relations. It is essential for individuals to seek information from credible and reliable sources to gain a nuanced understanding of complex topics like the relationship between Morocco and Israel.

Source: Aljazeera news: Will Morocco stay the course on Israel normalisation?