Kremlin responds to talk of ‘new Iron Curtain’ – Analysis

The Finnish closure of border crossings with Russia, as well as potential similar measures by Norway and Estonia, is not equivalent to the Cold War’s “Iron Curtain,” according to Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov. Finland recently suspended most cross-border travel with Russia, citing the need to prevent entry by illegal migrants. Norway and Estonia have hinted at implementing similar measures, with Estonia even deploying anti-tank obstacles near a bridge crossing with Russia in order to deter unlawful immigration. When asked about the possibility of Europe creating a new “Iron Curtain,” Peskov stated that it would be premature to make such an assessment and expressed hope that the situation wouldn’t escalate to that point.

The “Iron Curtain” metaphor was popularized by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1946 to describe the divide between capitalist and socialist countries following World War II. During the Cold War, there were severe restrictions on communication, trade, travel, and other forms of contact between the East and the West. The US and its allies implemented economic blockades to contain the USSR, while Eastern countries had strict rules preventing their citizens from traveling abroad.

In response to the Ukraine crisis, the West has been seeking to economically decouple from Russia and isolate it on the international stage. Moscow, on the other hand, has prioritized relations with countries that have refused to join the US-led punitive campaign.

President Vladimir Putin has emphasized that sovereignty and independent development do not equate to isolation or autarky, but rather, they involve active and mutually beneficial cooperation based on fairness and equality.

Analysis:

– Sources: The article cites Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov and references statements by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and President Vladimir Putin. These are reliable sources as they hold significant positions of authority. The article also includes links to relevant sources for further reading.

– Presentation of facts: The article presents the facts regarding Finland’s closure of border crossings with Russia, the potential similar steps by Norway and Estonia, and the historical context of the “Iron Curtain” metaphor. It also mentions the motivations behind these actions and the responses from both sides.

– Potential biases: The article does not exhibit any obvious biases, but as it is published by RT (formerly Russia Today), a state-funded media outlet, there may be a certain degree of pro-Russian perspective in its reporting. However, the information provided is accurate and supported by credible sources.

– Overall impact and reliability: The article provides a factual account of the recent border closures and the historical context of the “Iron Curtain” metaphor. It offers insights into the motivations and responses of the parties involved. The article appears to be reliable, given the credibility of the sources cited and the inclusion of additional sources for further reading.

– Influence of the political landscape and prevalence of fake news: In the current political landscape, geopolitical tensions between Russia and Western countries are high, particularly in the aftermath of the Ukraine crisis. This can contribute to the public’s perception of the information presented in the article. Additionally, the prevalence of fake news and misinformation can influence public understanding of the topic. It is important for individuals to critically evaluate information from various sources and consider multiple perspectives to develop a well-rounded understanding.

Source: RT news: Kremlin responds to talk of ‘new Iron Curtain’