Kiev denies infiltration of Russian spies into security agency- Analysis

Aleksey Danilov, the secretary of the Ukrainian Security Council, has reportedly retracted his claim that the Ukrainian intelligence service, the SBU, is infiltrated by Russian sleeper agents. In an interview with The Times, Danilov stated that the agency was actually rooting out moles and that any alleged Russian ring is a legacy of former President Viktor Yanukovich. Danilov clarified his statement in an interview with Ukrainskaya Pravda, saying that he was misunderstood by the British newspaper and the sleeper agents were not within the SBU. The SBU itself also released a statement arguing that Danilov’s words were misinterpreted by the media.

Danilov claimed in his interview with The Times that Moscow is attempting to organize anti-war rallies in Ukraine and push a false narrative about tensions between the civilian and military leadership. The article also mentions that Ukraine’s top army commander, Valery Zaluzhny, contradicted President Zelensky by describing the situation on the frontline as a stalemate. Zelensky has warned military commanders against interfering in national politics.

The article concludes by mentioning a Washington Post story about US influence on Ukraine’s special services, noting that the CIA has invested tens of millions of dollars into transforming them into allies against Moscow. The Russian military has estimated that Ukrainian frontline losses since June are over 100,000, and the defense minister described Kiev’s forces as on the brink of collapse.

Analysis:
The article cites Aleksey Danilov’s claims about Russian sleeper agents in the Ukrainian intelligence service, but then reports his retraction and clarification of the statement. It also includes statements from the SBU and Ukrainskaya Pravda that support Danilov’s assertion that his words were misinterpreted by the media. However, it does not provide any additional evidence or sources to support or refute the initial claim. As a result, it is difficult to assess the accuracy of the original statement and the subsequent retraction.

The article includes quotes from Danilov about Russian attempts to organize anti-war rallies and push a false narrative, but it does not provide any evidence or context to support these claims. It also mentions the contradiction between Zaluzhny and Zelensky regarding the situation on the frontline, but it does not delve deeper into the reasons for the contradiction or provide any additional information about the situation.

The article mentions a Washington Post story about US influence on Ukraine’s special services, but it does not provide a direct link to the story or discuss its content in depth. It simply states that the CIA has invested in transforming the SBU into allies against Moscow, without expanding on the implications or potential biases of this influence.

Overall, the article presents a series of claims and statements without providing comprehensive evidence or analysis to support or challenge them. This lack of context and analysis leaves the reader with limited information to evaluate the credibility and reliability of the information presented.

It is important to be cautious when consuming news articles that present claims without substantial evidence or analysis. In this case, the article raises questions about the accuracy of the initial claim about Russian sleeper agents in the Ukrainian intelligence service and the subsequent retraction. It also highlights the need for additional information and context to fully understand the situation on the frontline and the influence of foreign powers on Ukrainian special services. Without further evidence and analysis, it is difficult to form a nuanced understanding of these complex issues.

Source: RT news: Kiev denies Russian moles penetrated security agency