MP claims German army would only survive for two days- Analysis

The German armed forces are facing a shortage of funding and equipment, leaving them under-equipped and unable to resupply quickly enough, according to MP Dr Johann Wadephul. He expressed concern that in the event of a war, the German armed forces would only be able to last two days. He criticized the decision to send arms to Ukraine instead of using them to resupply the Bundeswehr. Wadephul called for an increase in the speed of re-equipping the German armed forces to address this shortage.

This comes as Germany has pledged over €17 billion ($18.6 billion) in military aid to Ukraine, making it Ukraine’s second-largest war sponsor after the US. The aid includes tanks, anti-aircraft missile systems, artillery, and ammunition. However, Wadephul noted that despite resupply orders, very little is actually reaching the German army, with most of the arms being sent to Ukraine.

Wadephul attributes the military’s lack of progress as a war-capable defense force to Defense Minister Boris Pistorius. He believes that Germany’s military forces have not changed significantly in the past two decades and have prioritized operations far from home rather than defending the country.

Meanwhile, the EU’s foreign affairs chief, Josep Borell, acknowledged that the initial stockpiles of ammunition have already been depleted, making it difficult to provide more to Ukraine. Despite this, Brussels has backtracked on its promise to send one million artillery rounds to Kiev by March.

Russia has warned that Western arms supplies to Ukraine will have little impact on the front lines, with Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu stating that the Kiev regime is still losing despite the supply of new weapons.

Analysis:
The credibility of the sources in this article is questionable as it is sourced from RT, which is a Russian state-funded media outlet known for its pro-Kremlin bias. The article lacks other sources or perspectives to provide a comprehensive view of the situation. As a result, there may be a potential bias towards presenting Germany’s military as under-equipped and blaming the decision to send arms to Ukraine for this shortage.

The presentation of facts in the article is limited and lacks context. While the article mentions the amount of aid pledged by Germany to Ukraine, it does not provide information on the overall budget or military spending of the Bundeswehr. Without this information, it is difficult to assess the significance of the shortage and the potential impact on Germany’s defense capabilities.

There may be a potential bias in the article as it focuses on the shortage of supplies in the German armed forces and criticizes the decision to send arms to Ukraine. This could be seen as an attempt to undermine Germany’s support for Ukraine and portray the country as being unprepared for a potential conflict.

The overall impact of the information presented in this article may contribute to a perception that Germany’s military is under-equipped and unable to defend itself adequately. However, without more comprehensive and balanced reporting, it is difficult to determine the accuracy of these claims.

In the broader political landscape, the prevalence of fake news and biased reporting can influence the public’s perception of the information presented. Media outlets with specific agendas can shape public opinion and create a distorted view of events. In the case of this article, the RT’s pro-Kremlin bias may contribute to a skewed understanding of Germany’s military capabilities and its support for Ukraine. It is important for readers to critically evaluate the sources of information and seek out multiple perspectives to gain a more nuanced understanding of the topic.

Source: RT news: German army would only last two days – MP