Google AI’s Suspension Following Historic Failure Sparks Racism Controversy. : Analysis

Reading Time (200 word/minute): 3 minutes

Google announced that their AI program Gemini, previously known as Bard, will no longer generate images of people due to inaccuracies in historical depictions. Users had criticized the program for returning “diverse” images instead of requested historical figures. The company is working on a patch to address the issue. Critics have labeled Gemini as “absurdly woke” and “blatantly racist.” Some have linked the programming biases to the company’s diversity doctrine. Gemini’s response to requests for images of white people suggested that such images reinforce harmful stereotypes. Edward Snowden criticized the idea of filtering AI with safety measures. Elon Musk trolled Gemini by posting photos of Canadian PM Trudeau, pretending they were generated by the AI.

Analysis:
The article discusses Google’s decision to update its AI program Gemini to stop generating images of people, a feature it had previously introduced under the name Bard. The company made this decision due to criticisms of inaccuracies in historical depictions, with users complaining about receiving “diverse” images instead of specific historical figures they had requested. Google acknowledged the issue and is now working on a patch to improve the accuracy of the program.

Critics have taken issue with Gemini’s shift in focus, labeling it as “absurdly woke” and “blatantly racist.” Some have tied these perceived biases in the program to Google’s diversity policies, suggesting that the company’s efforts to promote diversity have negatively influenced Gemini’s image-generating capabilities. Notably, Gemini’s response to requests for images of white people indicated that such images could reinforce harmful stereotypes, contributing to the controversy surrounding the AI program’s modifications.

The article mentions that Edward Snowden criticized the idea of filtering AI with safety measures, indicating a broader debate surrounding the use of AI and potential censorship. Additionally, Elon Musk humorously trolled Gemini by sharing photos of Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau, pretending they were generated by the AI.

In terms of credibility, the sources and information in the article should be evaluated with caution due to potential biases and sensational language used to describe the situation. The article may contribute to misinformation by framing the issue as a conflict between diversity and historical accuracy without diving deeper into the complexities of AI programming, biases, and ethical considerations. The polarized views presented in the article reflect the current political landscape and how issues related to diversity, racism, and technology are being navigated in public discourse.

Overall, readers should approach this article with a critical mindset, considering the sources’ reliability, biases, and the need for a nuanced understanding of the intersection of AI, diversity, and societal values. The prevalence of fake news and echo chambers in the current political environment can impact the public’s perception of such information, highlighting the importance of seeking multiple perspectives and fact-checking when engaging with complex topics like AI development and societal implications.

Source: RT news: ‘Racist’ Google AI suspended after historic failure

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *