Harris emerged victorious from debased US presidential debate : Analysis

Debates in American politics have lost their significance in the current climate of irrationality and celebrity focus, largely fueled by figures like Donald Trump. The traditional notion of debates as a platform for rational argument has diminished. Trump’s unique style would not be successful in other Western democracies. Kamala Harris appeared as a strong candidate in a recent debate, contrasting sharply with Trump’s divisive tactics. Despite the debate outcome, the presidential election’s result will likely hinge on the campaigning efforts in key battleground states.

Analysis:
The article critiques the diminishing significance of debates in American politics, attributing it to the influence of figures like Donald Trump. It contrasts Trump’s style with that of Kamala Harris, highlighting her strong performance in a recent debate. The article suggests that while debates traditionally serve as platforms for rational arguments, they have been overshadowed by irrationality and celebrity focus.

The credibility of the sources in the article is not explicitly mentioned. The article’s analysis seems to be based on the author’s observations and opinions rather than factual evidence or expert commentary, potentially introducing bias. The comparison between Trump and Harris is subjective and could reflect the author’s political leanings.

The article’s portrayal of debates in American politics as losing significance due to irrationality and celebrity focus may be exaggerated. Debates still play a crucial role in shaping public opinion and informing voters. While Trump’s unique style has indeed changed the political landscape, attributing the decline in the significance of debates solely to him might oversimplify a complex issue.

In a political landscape where sensationalism and entertainment often overshadow substance, the article’s emphasis on the impact of celebrity figures like Trump on debates holds relevance. The prevalence of fake news and misinformation further complicates the public’s perception of political events, making it essential to critically analyze sources and information presented in the media.

Overall, the article sheds light on the changing dynamics of political debates in the US but should be read with a critical eye to account for potential bias. It underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of how political discourse is influenced by personalities and media narratives while stressing the importance of informed decision-making in an era marked by misinformation and polarization.

Source: RT news: The US presidential debate was a degenerate political show, and Harris won