Israel’s Compliance with Laws of War: Are Obligations Being Met? : Analysis

Israel has reinitiated their assault on Gaza after a 7-day ceasefire failed to extend in the besieged territory. Residential areas and refugee camps in the north, center, and south of Gaza have been targeted by air strikes. The population in Gaza was already experiencing a humanitarian crisis, with 80% of the people being displaced and the healthcare system collapsing, according to the United Nations.

The Israeli army offensive raises concerns about responsibility and accountability. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu argues that Israel is acting in self-defense after Hamas attacks on southern Israel on October 7 resulted in the deaths of 1,200 people. Israel began bombing Gaza on the same day and later launched a ground offensive, causing over 15,000 Palestinian casualties.

According to international law, Israel is the occupying power in Gaza and the West Bank, and is obligated to protect all people residing in those areas. However, Israel does not recognize Palestine as a state and claims that Hamas has bases in hospitals and residential areas, justifying their targeting as legitimate military actions.

This article lacks specific details and sources to support its claims. The information about the number of casualties and displaced individuals provided by the United Nations is not cited, which makes it difficult to assess its accuracy. Furthermore, the article presents only one perspective, that of the Palestinian side, without including any Israeli sources or viewpoints.

The bias in this article is evident in its one-sided presentation of facts and its failure to provide a balanced view of the situation. The omission of Israeli perspectives and the lack of specific evidence to support the claims made by the United Nations and the Palestinian side contribute to the potential misinformation and bias presented in the article.

The political landscape and the prevalence of fake news can influence the public’s perception of the information. In this case, the lack of credible sources and the absence of a balanced presentation can contribute to a skewed understanding of the conflict. Depending on their pre-existing biases and beliefs, individuals may interpret the information in a way that reinforces their existing views or may see it as unreliable due to the lack of evidence.

Overall, this article’s reliability is questionable due to its lack of specific details, sources, and balanced presentation of facts. It is important for readers to seek out additional sources and perspectives to develop a more nuanced understanding of the situation.

Source: Aljazeera news: Is Israel meeting its obligations under the laws of war?