Moscow believes Ukraine ceasefire is unlikely in 2024.- Analysis

NATO Takes Risks with Russia’s Core Interests, Warns Russian Deputy Foreign Minister

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov has expressed skepticism about the possibility of a ceasefire in the Ukraine conflict next year. In an interview with the Izvestia newspaper, Ryabkov criticized the position taken by Kiev and its Western supporters, calling it unacceptable to Moscow. Despite reports suggesting that the US may be pushing Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky towards a negotiated settlement, Ryabkov does not expect any breakthroughs.

Ryabkov specifically highlighted the US-led Western group’s adherence to the “Zelensky peace formula” as a major obstacle to dialogue. He believes that a ceasefire is unlikely next year and expects the goals of the Ukrainian military operation to be achieved without any compromise.

The “peace formula” proposed by Zelensky calls for Kiev to regain control over its pre-2014 borders, receive war reparations from Moscow, subject Russian officials to a war tribunal, and gain international support. However, Moscow has dismissed this proposal as detached from reality.

There have been recent claims that the US and Germany are limiting arms deliveries to Ukraine to pressure Zelensky into making concessions. However, the White House maintains that its policy remains the same and that the conduct of the war is Ukraine’s decision. In addition, an ally of Zelensky, David Arakhamia, revealed in an interview that former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson had obstructed a possible truce with Russia and encouraged Ukraine to continue fighting. He also stated that Moscow’s main goal is to ensure Ukraine’s neutrality.

According to Ryabkov, NATO’s expansion in Europe is the main cause of the Ukraine conflict. He believes that Moscow’s relationship with the US-led military bloc is unlikely to recover due to principles and practicalities. Ryabkov warned that NATO members are taking risks by encroaching on Russian interests and that they may ultimately lose if they continue to escalate tensions.

Analysis:

The credibility of the sources in this article is a significant concern. The article is from RT, which is a Russian state-funded media outlet known for its pro-Russian bias. As a result, the information presented in the article may be influenced by a particular agenda.

The article presents the viewpoints of Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov without providing alternative perspectives or responses. This lack of balance can contribute to a one-sided and potentially biased understanding of the situation. It is essential to consult multiple sources and consider diverse viewpoints to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the issue.

There is a potential bias in the article’s portrayal of Ukraine and its Western supporters. The article tends to minimize the agency of Ukraine and its government, suggesting that its position is dictated by Western backers. This portrayal may oversimplify the complex dynamics of the conflict and undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty and decision-making capabilities.

The article does not provide any evidence or analysis to support the claim that NATO’s expansion in Europe is the main cause of the Ukraine conflict. This assertion aligns with Russia’s narrative but lacks the necessary evidence to be substantiated. It is important to critically evaluate such claims and seek additional information to form an informed opinion.

The overall impact of this article could contribute to misinformation or a limited understanding of the Ukraine conflict. The lack of diverse perspectives and credible sources, coupled with potential biases, may shape readers’ perceptions and reinforce preexisting beliefs. This can further deepen divisions and hinder efforts to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

Given the prevalence of fake news and the influence of political agendas, the public’s perception of the information presented in this article may be affected. Individuals who consume news primarily from biased or unverified sources may develop a skewed understanding of the situation, leading to misinformation and polarization. It is crucial for individuals to critically evaluate sources and seek out diverse viewpoints to mitigate the impact of fake news on public perception.

Source: RT news: Ukraine ceasefire unlikely in 2024 – Moscow