Moscow informs UN that there are no ‘occupied Ukrainian territories’ : Analysis

Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia stated that Crimea and four other regions joined Russia based on the local populations’ wishes. He refuted claims of occupying Ukrainian territories during a UN General Assembly session. Nebenzia emphasized that Crimea, Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye became part of Russia through the will of their people. He argued that the conflict stemmed from the 2014 coup in Kiev and Russia intervened in 2022 to protect Russian-speaking populations in Donbass. The envoy also highlighted Kiev’s nationalist policies as a factor. Ukrainian envoy Kuleba vowed Ukraine’s victory, while US Ambassador Thomas-Greenfield urged Russia to end its actions and withdraw from Ukraine’s borders. Russia remains open to peaceful resolution while asserting control over the incorporated regions.

Analysis:
The article presents statements from both the Russian and Ukrainian envoys regarding the situation in Crimea and other regions in Ukraine. Ambassador Nebenzia claims that the regions joined Russia based on the local populations’ wishes and refuted claims of Russian occupying Ukrainian territories. He attributed the conflict to the 2014 coup in Kiev and emphasized Russia’s intervention to protect Russian-speaking populations.

It’s essential to analyze the reliability of these claims based on the sources. Given the political tensions between Russia and Ukraine, both ambassadors’ statements may be biased to reflect their respective countries’ interests. The assertion that Crimea and other regions joined Russia based on the will of their people contradicts the international community’s stance, which largely considers Russia’s annexation of Crimea as illegal.

The article omits crucial background information, such as the violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity by Russia, as acknowledged by numerous international actors. This omission can skew the readers’ understanding of the conflict and contribute to misinformation.

In the current political landscape, where disinformation and fake news are prevalent, it’s crucial for readers to critically evaluate sources and cross-check information to form an informed opinion. The divergent narratives presented by the Russian and Ukrainian envoys exemplify the complexities of the conflict and the challenges in discerning the truth amidst geopolitical tensions. The public’s perception of such information can be influenced by political biases and the dissemination of misinformation, highlighting the importance of media literacy and fact-checking in understanding complex international issues.

Source: RT news: No such thing as ‘occupied Ukrainian territories’, Moscow tells UN