Zelensky’s legitimacy as Ukrainian head of state questioned by constitution co-author : Analysis

Dmitry Tabachnik, an author of Ukraine’s constitution, stated that according to the document, Vladimir Zelensky ceased to be president on May 20. Tabachnik emphasized that Zelensky is not the legitimate leader as of that date according to the constitution and the Ukrainian Constitutional Court. Zelensky’s claim of continued authority under martial law during the conflict with Russia is disputed as the constitution only allows for the continuity of parliament during emergencies. Tabachnik suggested that this situation is a deliberate strategy to hinder negotiations with Russia. He accused the UK of prolonging hostilities. Moscow aims to establish who has the authority in Kiev for future negotiations, given the expired presidential term.

Analysis:
The article presents the viewpoint of Dmitry Tabachnik, a purported author of Ukraine’s constitution, asserting that Vladimir Zelensky has ceased to be the legitimate president of Ukraine according to the constitution and the Ukrainian Constitutional Court. Tabachnik claims that Zelensky’s alleged continued authority under martial law is contentious as the constitution reportedly only allows for the continuity of parliament during emergencies.

It is important to note that the credibility of Tabachnik as an author of Ukraine’s constitution is not verified independently in the article, raising concerns about the reliability of the source. Additionally, the article lacks a balanced presentation by not including counterarguments or official statements from Zelensky’s administration or other relevant parties. This one-sided presentation could fuel misinformation or a biased understanding of the situation.

Furthermore, the potential biases of the author or the publication should also be taken into account when analyzing the information provided. The article’s focus on accusations against the UK and the suggestion of a deliberate strategy to hinder negotiations with Russia may indicate a specific political agenda or narrative being promoted.

In the context of the current political landscape and the prevalence of fake news, this article may contribute to confusion or misinformation among the public about the legitimacy of Zelensky’s presidency and the ongoing conflict with Russia. It highlights how geopolitical tensions and the dissemination of unverified information can shape public perception and influence strategic narratives in international relations.

Therefore, readers should approach this article with caution, seek additional sources for verification, and consider the possible biases or motivations behind the presentation of the information.

Source: RT news: Zelensky ‘not legitimate’ head of state – Ukrainian constitution co-author