Aid delivery near the border of Egypt and Gaza has been halted as Israel resumed its military campaign, causing further delays to the already complicated delivery process. Truck drivers at the crossing reported that the bombardment by Israel has prevented them from moving forward. Egyptian security sources and a Red Crescent official confirmed that aid and fuel trucks from Egypt have stopped entering Gaza. With the resumption of fighting, the United Nations expressed concern about the continuation of aid deliveries.
A spokesperson for the Rafah border crossing also confirmed that the entrance of trucks carrying essential aid, fuel, and cooking gas from Egypt into Gaza has stopped due to the Israeli bombardment. Since Israel began its siege and bombardment of Gaza, Rafah has been the only entry point for aid into the region. The spokesperson for the Ministry of Health in Gaza, Ashraf al-Qudra, called for the opening of the Rafah crossing due to the catastrophic humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The limited medical aid that entered Gaza during the truce is only enough for one day, and the health sector is severely strained.
Meanwhile, Israeli air attacks have resulted in the deaths of at least 109 people and hundreds of injuries, placing a significant burden on medical personnel who are facing a shortage of beds. According to Palestinian officials, over 15,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since October 7. In comparison, the official death toll in Israel from the October 7 attack stands at about 1,200.
To address the aid shortages, international flights have been delivering aid to El Arish airport in Sinai, and truck convoys from Cairo have been bringing additional supplies. However, a system put in place since October 21 has caused delays, as aid trucks have to make a round trip of over 80km (50 miles) for inspection at the Al-Awja and Nitzana crossings on the Egyptian-Israeli border before returning to Rafah for delivery.
During the truce, more aid was able to enter Gaza, but it fell far short of the required quantities for the 2.3 million residents, many of whom have been displaced by the war. Egyptian truck drivers have experienced lengthy delays and inspections by Israeli security personnel at Al-Awja. The United Nations has called on Israel to open the Karem Abu Salem crossing near Rafah, which used to handle large quantities of goods before the war. However, Israel, concerned about aid being used by Hamas, has refused.
Before the war, as many as 500 aid trucks entered Gaza daily through Rafah. During the truce, this number increased to around 200 daily. However, deliveries were still hindered by fuel shortages or interruptions caused by bombardments. With the fighting resuming, truck drivers anticipate being stuck for an extended period.
Overall, the information presented in this article appears to rely on statements from various sources, including Egyptian security sources, a Red Crescent official, a spokesperson for the Rafah border crossing, and the Ministry of Health in Gaza. These sources contribute to the credibility of the information. However, readers should be aware that the article does not provide any responses or statements from Israeli authorities or offer a balanced perspective on the conflict.
The potential bias in this article lies in the focus on the Israeli bombardment and the impact on aid delivery to Gaza. The article does not delve into the reasons behind the Israeli action or provide a broader context of the conflict. This can potentially contribute to a limited understanding of the situation and a one-sided view of the conflict. Additionally, the article does not discuss the actions or rhetoric from Palestinian armed group Hamas, which could contribute to a skewed perception of the conflict.
The impact of this article is likely to raise concerns about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the difficulties faced by aid workers in delivering essential supplies. It may generate sympathy for the suffering of the Palestinian population and criticize Israel’s actions. However, without a complete picture of the conflict and the involvement of multiple parties, including Hamas, this article may contribute to a limited and potentially biased understanding of the situation.
In the current political landscape, where the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is highly polarized, the prevalence of fake news and misinformation can significantly influence public perception. Individuals who only rely on limited sources or biased narratives may form entrenched opinions without considering alternative viewpoints. This reinforces existing biases and hinders constructive dialogue and potential resolutions to the conflict. It is crucial for readers to seek out diverse sources of information and critically evaluate the credibility and context of the news they consume.