History Repeats Itself: Survivors Compare Israel’s Siege of Beirut to Gaza : Analysis

Reading Time (200 word/minute): 4 minutes

Sleiman Bakhti, the owner of a bookshop and publishing house in Beirut’s Hamra neighborhood, reflects on the contrast between the atmosphere of “light and hope” in Hamra during the Lebanese Civil War and the ongoing violence in Gaza. Hamra was once a cultural and intellectual hub in the Middle East, attracting poets, writers, and political dissidents from around the region. Many Palestinians, including Yasser Arafat and Ghassan Kanafani, sought refuge in Hamra after being expelled from Jordan in the aftermath of the 1967 war. In 1982, Israel invaded southern Lebanon and besieged West Beirut, leading to a devastating siege and aggression. West Beirutis draw parallels between the violence of that time and the ongoing genocide in Gaza. The siege of West Beirut resulted in the death of thousands of people and severe shortages of medical supplies, food, and other necessities. The water shortage led to the consumption of unclean water, causing health issues. Today, Gaza faces similar challenges, with Israeli officials accusing Hamas of using “human shields” and a significant portion of the population at risk of famine. Both Beirut and Gaza have experienced the collapse of their healthcare systems and the spread of diseases. In 1982, doctors often did not have time to administer anesthesia, and there were reports of extreme psychosomatic effects. Israel’s bombing in Gaza has been ongoing for nearly three months, causing immense suffering. Some residents of West Beirut fled the city, while others stayed to protect their property. Israel’s use of phosphorus in West Beirut caused severe burns and affected the hospitals’ ability to treat victims. International human rights organizations have documented Israel’s unlawful use of white phosphorus in Gaza and south Lebanon. Bakhti describes the situation in Gaza as “genocide” and believes it is worse than death.

The article discusses the reflections of Sleiman Bakhti, the owner of a bookshop and publishing house in Beirut’s Hamra neighborhood, on the ongoing violence in Gaza and draws parallels between the siege of West Beirut during the Lebanese Civil War and the current situation in Gaza. The article highlights the impact of the violence on the healthcare systems, shortage of medical supplies and food, consumption of unclean water, and the use of phosphorus by Israel. It also mentions accusations against Hamas of using human shields and the risk of famine in Gaza.

In terms of credibility, the article does not provide specific sources for the information presented. It relies on the perspective and experiences of Sleiman Bakhti, who is not identified as an expert or a representative of a particular organization or institution. Therefore, the credibility of the information is limited due to the lack of verifiable sources.

The presentation of facts in the article is primarily based on personal anecdotes and narratives. It does not provide statistical data or objective evidence to support its claims. While the article includes references to Israel’s alleged use of white phosphorus and the impact of the violence on healthcare systems, it does not provide specific sources or citations to validate these statements.

The potential biases in the article include a clear bias against Israeli actions, characterizing them as a “genocide” and using phrases such as “siege,” “invaded,” and “aggression” to describe Israel’s actions. The article also does not provide any counter-perspectives or alternative viewpoints on the situation in Gaza, which may contribute to a one-sided narrative.

Overall, the article lacks reliable sources, objective evidence, and alternative perspectives, limiting its credibility and potentially contributing to misinformation or a biased understanding of the topic.

In the current political landscape, where the prevalence of fake news and misinformation is a concern, articles like these without credible sources or balanced perspectives can reinforce existing biases and influence the public’s perception of the information. It is important for readers to seek out diverse sources, fact-check information, and critically evaluate the credibility of the sources to develop a more nuanced understanding of complex situations like the one discussed in the article.

Source: Aljazeera news: Survivors of Israel’s siege of Beirut see history repeating itself in Gaza

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *