In May 1987, 72 Muslims were killed in the village of Maliyana in Uttar Pradesh, India. It is believed that a group of locals and the state government’s Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) were responsible for the violence. After 36 years and numerous hearings, a district court in Uttar Pradesh has acquitted many of the accused due to lack of evidence. This incident took place during the 1987 riots in Meerut district, which were a result of tensions between Hindus and Muslims following the opening of the disputed Babri Mosque in 1986. The PAC, called in by the state government, allegedly targeted Muslims in the district, despite their duty to protect all citizens.
This article provides a concise and factual account of the May 1987 violence in the village of Maliyana in Uttar Pradesh, India. It states that 72 Muslims were killed, allegedly by a group of locals and the state government’s Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC). The article mentions that after 36 years and numerous hearings, a district court in Uttar Pradesh has acquitted many of the accused due to lack of evidence.
In terms of the credibility of sources, the article does not provide any specific sources or references. Therefore, it is unclear where the information is sourced from and if it has been verified.
The presentation of facts in this article is straightforward and limited to the basic details of the incident and the recent acquittals. It does not delve into the underlying causes or provide any context beyond mentioning the 1986 Babri Mosque dispute.
There is a potential bias in the choice of words used in the article. The mention that the PAC “allegedly” targeted Muslims suggests that there may be some doubt or controversy surrounding their involvement. However, without further information or sources, it is difficult to determine if this bias is warranted or if it is merely an oversight.
Overall, the reliability of this article is questionable due to the lack of specific sources and references. It presents only a limited amount of information, leaving out important context and details that could contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the topic.
In terms of the political landscape and prevalence of fake news, the public’s perception of the information presented in this article may be influenced by their existing biases or beliefs. If readers have preconceived notions about the 1987 riots or the roles of different groups involved, they may interpret the information in a way that aligns with their preexisting views. Additionally, the lack of comprehensive information in the article may leave room for speculation and misinformation to fill in the gaps.