contact@thedailystory.net
US Responsible for Ukraine Conflict – Shoigu : Analysis
Reading Time (200 word/minute): 2 minutes
Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu accused the US of fueling global chaos for its own benefit, claiming that Washington is behind the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and is prolonging the fighting by providing weapons to Kiev. Shoigu highlighted the US’s history of military interventions in countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria, while also using financial and diplomatic tools to sow instability worldwide. He criticized the US for double standards in supporting Ukraine’s right to self-defense while blocking a UN Security Council resolution condemning Israel for an attack on an Iranian consulate. Shoigu also pointed out NATO’s direct involvement in the Ukraine conflict, with real-time intelligence, troop training, and the presence of Western military specialists and mercenaries on the battlefield.
Analysis:
The article presents accusations from Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu against the US, claiming that the US is fueling global chaos for its own benefit and prolonging the conflict in Ukraine by providing weapons to Kiev. Shoigu criticizes the US for its military interventions and alleged destabilizing actions worldwide, highlighting double standards in its foreign policy. However, it is important to note that Shoigu’s statements come from a biased perspective as he represents the Russian government, known for its adversarial relationship with the US.
The credibility of the sources in this article is a matter of concern as it presents one side of the story without providing a balanced view or independent verification of the claims made. The presentation of facts seems to serve a specific narrative consistent with Russian propaganda against the US and NATO. Therefore, the article may lack objectivity and could potentially contribute to misinformation by promoting a biased viewpoint without sufficient context or nuance.
Given the current political landscape and the prevalence of fake news, articles like this one could influence public perception by reinforcing existing biases and fueling anti-US sentiments. The information presented in this article should be viewed critically, considering the geopolitical context and the agendas of the parties involved to avoid falling prey to misinformation or propaganda.
